Search for: "Anthony F. Grant " Results 241 - 260 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2010, 2:31 am by John L. Welch
CUSTOMS Logo Barred by Sections 2(a) and 2(b)Section 2(d) - Likelihood of Confusion:Precedential No. 46: TTAB Finds Two "ANTHONY'S" Marks Confusingly Similar for Pizza RestaurantsPrecedential No. 44: TTAB Decides "CAB CALLOWAY" Priority Dispute, Rules that Personal Names Are Inherently DistinctivePrecedential No. 43: TTAB Enters Partial Summary Judgment in 2(d) "VUDU" OppositionPrecedential No. 41: Applicant Loses Third-Party Registration Battle, TTAB… [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 4:58 am by Beatrice Yahia
  The Netherlands will begin sending F-16 fighter jets to Ukraine “without delay” after export licenses were granted, Dutch Foreign Minister Caspar Veldkamp said during a visit to Kyiv this weekend. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The journalist sued the sculptor for numerous claims including defamation, but the district court granted the defendant-sculptor's motion to dismiss. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As a result, I conclude that the District Court erred in granting Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment…. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports on Monday’s grant in Madison v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am by Ronald Mann
His assertion that Congress had almost plenary authority to define the boundaries of patent grants struck a nerve with Chief Justice John Roberts, who responded: [Y]our position, it strikes me, is simply that you’ve got to take the bitter with the sweet. [read post]
11 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm
 Pix credit here I have been writing about the transformation of the national security exception, which appears to be roaring back to life after a generation of efforts to reduce it to insignificance with the parameters of the so-called Washington Consensus, the social collective premises of the EU, and to some extent version 1.0 of China's Reform and Opening Up. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm by OK Blawg Editor - James Dee Graves
Reynolds, 1994 OK CR 54, P9, 880 P.2d 391, 394; Matter of L.N., 1980 OK CR 72, P3, 617 P.2d 239, 240.ANTHONY WAYNE JACOBS, Appellant -vs- STATE OF OKLAHOMA, AppelleeCase Number: F-2005-104COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 4; 128 P.3d 1085; 2006 Okla. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:00 pm by Aurora Barnes
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit erred when it held that equitable exceptions apply to mandatory claim-processing rules—such as Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), which establishes a 14-day deadline to file a petition for permission to appeal an order granting or denying class-action certification—and can excuse a party’s failure to file timely within the deadline specified by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(f), in conflict with the decisions… [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:00 am by Richard Hunt
Anthony, Inc., 886 F.3d 674 (8th Cir. 2018).* Defendants apparently tried to remediate the architectural barriers alleged in the complaint, but it does appear from the opinion that they retained an expert. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step) District… [read post]