Search for: "Application of Floyd" Results 241 - 260 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2020, 5:31 am by Peter Groves
; and Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL v Huawei Technologies Co Ltd  (Henry Carr J) [2018] EWHC 808 (Pat), and [2019] EWCA Civ 38 (judgment given by Floyd LJ). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 7:26 am
He noted that the application of plausibility depends on the context of the case. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 9:41 am
The Court of Appeal pawing at a combination SPC this holidayseason ...It is the most wonderful time of the year. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 9:48 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following  235 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in November 2019 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration No. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:21 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Application Serial No. 87922801 (the “First Application”) with the USPTO for a stylized FLOYD’s logo (the “Floyd’s logo”) for “Alcoholic beverages, except beer” on May 15, 2018. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Seattle officials impose ordinance requiring landlords to rent to the first applicant who meets a landlord's announced criteria. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 12:26 am
As Floyd LJ wondered in London Taxi: should one take into account or ignore the fact that consumers will recognise the shape? [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 6:02 am
Lord Justice Floyd’s reasoning chimes with the Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, which states that “an application may only be objected to for lack of sufficient disclosure if there are serious doubts, substantiated by verifiable facts” (Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, II, C.6.1.4). [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 7:59 am by Kenan Farrell
Three Floyds is already opposing one of Floyd’s trademark applications that claims “Alcoholic beverages, except beer. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 6:07 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following  254 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in July 2019 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration No. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 8:35 am by Brian Cordery
Allowing the appeal, the Court of Appeal (Floyd LJ giving leading judgment, Lewison LJ in agreement) considered that, in light of the waiver from ZyXEL, there was no useful purpose in determining the scope and terms of the licence which TQ Delta is bound to offer – ZyXEL had said that they have no interest in deploying a licence, whatever its terms would ultimately prove to be, to prevent the grant of an injunction. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:10 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following  207 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in June 2019 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration No. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:18 am by Patricia Salkin
In this case, the Fire Department appealed the trial court’s denial of its petition for judicial review of a decision of the Floyd County Board of Zoning Appeals to deny its application. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
| Gleissner trade mark application is Trumped | Book review: Who Owns the News? [read post]