Search for: "Application of Jensen" Results 241 - 258 of 258
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
It is one month before the presidential election; it has been three years since the Michael Flynn case began; and there have been two D.C. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 11:27 am by MBettman
In a September 12, 2016 decision written by Judge Arlene Singer and joined by Judges Mark Pietrykowski and James Jensen, the Sixth District affirmed the lower court, holding that the licensing provisions at issue violated the Ohio Constitution’s single-subject rule, were an unlawful delegation of the state’s licensing authority and constituted an undue burden on a woman’s right to obtain an abortion. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
We received a copy of Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 1:03 pm by Josh Wright
Increasingly, the notion that updating antitrust policy with the insights of behavioral economics would significantly improve matters for consumers. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:14 am by MBettman
Justice O’Donnell has also recused himself from this appeal, and Sixth District Court of Appeals Judge James Jensen will sit for him. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
”Expert Statement  Jared Holt (Resident Fellow, Digital Forensic Research Lab, Atlantic Council) Expert Statement Brian Hughes (Associate Director, Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab, American University)Expert Statement Aziz Huq (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School) and Tom Ginsburg (Professor of Law, University of Chicago Law School)“Statement on the January 6, 2021 Attacks and the Threat to American Democracy”Expert Statement  Sam… [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
Jensen, 534 N.W.2d 361, 368 (Wis. 1995) ("the physician-patient privilege did not protect communications relevant to or within the scope of discovery"); Stigliano v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am by Eugene Volokh
" We held the employee's violation of the rule prohibiting excessive garnishments did not bear a "'reasonable application and relation to the employee's task[s]'" at work. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
The settlement includes a covenant not to sue pursuant to Sections 106 and 107 of CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9606 and 9607, or other applicable law, for liability for response actions and/or claims for natural resource damages arising from the disposal of hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants in the Repository that is to be constructed on the Property. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 6:58 am by Jack Goldsmith, Nathaniel Sobel
In May 2019, Attorney General William Barr tapped Connecticut’s U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Jensen, 534 N.W.2d 361, 368 (Wis. 1995); Stigliano v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've blogged before about the importance of both sides in personal injury litigation - and especially drug/medical device product liability litigation involving the learned intermediary rule - having equal rights to talk to treating/prescribing physicians. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am by Wolfgang Demino
 Now, Shamoun is getting an opportunity to sway the Texas Supreme Court to gut the statute of frauds applicable to contingent fee contracts by permitting attorneys to recover success-based claims for windfall fees calculated as a percentage of the amount recovered for the client (or saved) which would be barred by the statute in the absence of a written contract signed by the client. [read post]