Search for: "Application of Richards"
Results 241 - 260
of 6,649
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am
On 17 and 18 October 2023, the UK Supreme Court (Lords Hodge, Hamblen, Leggatt, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of George v Cannell. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:56 am
“Error is as important as malevolence,” says former Navy secretary Richard Danzig. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
By Julius Young, Richard M. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 2:26 am
In Re D [2008] 1 WLR 1499 at [27] Lord Carswell approved what had been said by Richards LJ in R (N) v Mental Health Review Tribunal (Northern Region) [2006] QB 468 at [62] who had said, ‘Although there is a single civil standard of proof on the balance of probabilities, it is flexible in its application. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 11:00 pm
Katz, Cohen & Wolf Employment Application (OR) – by Lauren J. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Richard Mailey takes that account of mine and puts it into fruitful conversation with Canadian judicial developments commencing with the SCC decision in Dolphin Delivery. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
As the late Peter Hogg put it: “It seems odd that the applicability of the Charter should turn on the question whether the applicable law is a rule of the common law or a rule of statute law” (Hogg, at 277). [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
First, the revised Circular should focus on basic principles that are universally applicable—emphasizing the need for evidence-based analysis and for transparent discussion of data sources, assumptions, and associated uncertainties. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 9:03 pm
This guidance is consistent with the Commission’s proposed amendments, which were intended to clarify and affirm the applicable legal standards with respect to group formation. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Any subsequent interpretation or application of the norms and criteria at stake must therefore be distinguished from the prior endorsement of those norms and criteria. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 8:57 am
To be clear, not every application of harassment law raises free speech concerns. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
National/Federal Supreme Court to Decide Landmark Texas, Florida Social Media Cases and More MSN – Ann Marimow and Cat Zakrzewski (Washington Post) | Published: 9/29/2023 The Supreme Court said it would wade into the future of free speech online and decide whether laws passed in Texas and Florida can restrict social media companies from removing certain political posts or accounts. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
Smith, which holds that laws of general applicability that burden religious exercise are not subject to strict scrutiny. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
In July and August 2023, the SEC filed 84 actions and the CFTC filed 16, against a combined total of 176 defendants and respondents. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 2:08 pm
Another reason why the proposed new rule once finalized will be limited in its application is because it pertains to only one statute: the FLSA. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 10:14 pm
Such an expansive application hardly seems consistent with the notions of federal criminal prosecution for felonies. [read post]
25 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Merrill.The Online Courtroom: Leveraging Remote Technology in Litigation (2022) edited by Richard Gabriel and Ken Broda-Bahm.The Shadow Docket: How the Supreme Court Uses Stealth Rulings to Amass Power and Undermine the Republic (2023) by Stephen Vladeck.Diversifying the Courts: Race, Gender, and Judicial Legitimacy (2023) by Nancy Scherer.Taking Problem-Solving Courts to Scale: Diverse Applications of the Specialty Court Model (2021) by Eileen M. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 7:21 pm
AN INTRODUCTION TO E. [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am
Richard Scorer, Surviving Church: Mandatory Reporting versus the Seal of the Confessional: coincidentally, the Information Commissioner’s Office has published A 10-step guide to sharing information to safeguard children. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Unapologetic Ex-Ambassador Avoids Prison in Illicit Lobbying Case MSN – Craig Whitlock (Washington Post) | Published: 9/16/2023 Richard Olson Jr., a former U.S. ambassador to Pakistan and the United Arab Emirates, was sentenced to three years’ probation and a $93,350 fine for violating federal lobbying and ethics laws in a case that exposed a secret history of romantic liaisons and lavish gifts during his 34-year career as a diplomat. [read post]
