Search for: "Apprendi v. New Jersey"
Results 241 - 260
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2007, 1:29 pm
The Supreme Court's decisions in Apprendi v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:05 pm
New Jersey have been glossed over while the federal courts grow more backlogged in the process. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 8:32 am
New Jersey and subsequent Supreme Court cases have extended the Sixth Amendment right of jury trial to some, but not all, factual disputes at sentencing. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 1:49 am
Here's the abstract: Apprendi v. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000) can't be retroactively applied under Teague. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:51 am
" Here's the abstract: Apprendi v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm
New Jersey. [read post]
5 Apr 2007, 10:02 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), does not apply. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 5:59 am
New Jersey and Blakely v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 10:31 pm
Thus, under the Court's earlier decision in Apprendi v. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
New Jersey. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 11:43 pm
(Apprendi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 4:19 am
In the 2000 case that got the series started, Apprendi v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
First, the prior cases in a nutshell, [Apprendi]invalidated New Jersey’s hate-crime statute, which gave judges the power to make the specific factual findings that converted an ordinary crime into a hate crime, with an enhanced sentence. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
New Jersey lawyer Steven Sanders, who has long been thoughtfully examining the issue of how to deal with Blakely errors, sent me this thoughtful comment about Justice Scalia's curious work yesterday in his dissent in United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
New Jersey but before Blakely v. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:39 am
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000) and are not facts that a jury must find under Blakely v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 8:04 am
New Jersey, a case that "revolutionized sentencing laws. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 8:49 am
Washington a new rule or was it dictated by Apprendi v. [read post]
