Search for: "Arthur Andersen"
Results 241 - 260
of 506
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 11:13 am
Of course, if BP America is felling stubborn and ornery enough, it could try this, figuring that it has as little to lose as did Arthur Andersen. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:00 pm
Threaten to go Arthur Andersen on a company, offer to let the company off the hook under a deferred prosecution agreement in return for offering up an executive or two as sacrificial lambs to be prosecuted, and then bludgeon the individual’s career, life and family into bits under the sledgehammer of the DOJ’s prosecutorial power. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:48 am
Further, a bankruptcy trustee stands in the shoes of the debtor and is able to maintain actions that the debtor could have brought prior to the bankruptcy proceedings (see generally Hirsch v Arthur Andersen & Co., 72 F3d 1085). [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 8:17 am
And Andersen did shorten its prior name of Arthur Andersen and changed its logo from the double doors to the orange sun. [read post]
31 May 2010, 3:50 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Arthur Andersen LLP v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 2:59 pm
Sounds awfully close to an argument that the company, qua company, can never commit a fraud because it can never have specific intent.That certainly turned out to be the Achilles heel of the prosecution of the Arthur Andersen accounting firm in the wake of the Enron scandal.I actually think there may be something to this argument and it is part (not all) of the problem I see with imposing criminal liability on entities like corporations. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 9:33 am
Of course, the guy is a former chair of the Portland Development Commission and an Arthur Andersen alum. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:51 pm
How an Arthur Andersen Lawyer Rebuilt Her Career [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 7:20 pm
Nancy Temple was the Arthur Andersen lawyer whom the jurors in the obstruction of justice case blamed (wrongly, I think) as the "corrupt persuader. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 6:54 am
If you followed the Arthur Andersen affair, you might enjoy reading how Nancy Temple reclaimed her career -- one day and one task at a time. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:15 am
Edwards left Arthur Andersen, he sued to invalidate the non-compete agreement. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:21 am
In the case, Arthur Andersen & Company v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 5:00 am
Their only hope may be that both civil and criminal proceedings take so damn long that they’ll instead die a slow and painful death by litigation and suffocating legal fees than by the swift sword of an Arthur Andersen-type criminal indictment by the US Department of Justice. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 6:49 am
This case was, Arthur Andersen & Company v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:47 am
The Accenture name emerged in discord, as both Andersen Consulting and Arthur Andersen Consulting competed for the same accounts. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 9:22 am
It is an eerie echo of the fate of erstwhile big auditing firm Arthur Andersen, which dissolved after its culpability in 2001’s Enron fraud emerged. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 11:41 am
We welcome Big Four alumni and current professionals to join, including those who have worked at Arthur Andersen, Andersen, Andersen Consulting, Arthur Young, Ernst & Whinney, Price Waterhouse, Coopers and Lybrand, Deloitte Haskins and Sells, Touche Ross, Peat Marwick Mitchell, Klynveld Main Goerdeler, as also BearingPoint, Resources Global Professionals, Protiviti, Big Four spin-off firms and firms affiliated with the Big Four from all countries. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:29 pm
Fox responded by bringing up Arthur Andersen's experience in serving as auditor for Enron, which he described as the best argument against changing Rule 5.4. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 10:48 am
Hagen at 515-246-4543 or hhagen@dickinsonlaw.com or Arthur Owens at 515-246-4515 or aowens@dickinsonlaw.com or Jeff Andersen at 515-246-4503 or jandersen@dickinsonlaw.com. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 11:59 am
This amendment appears to be a response to recent prosecutions, such as the Arthur Andersen case, founded on allegations that multiple persons within organizations destroyed investigation-sensitive documents and that the organizations lacked document-retention policies which would have prevented the destruction. [read post]
