Search for: "Attorney General v. Brown"
Results 241 - 260
of 2,178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 4:39 am
In Brown v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am
Retirement Trust v Brown, Raysman, Millstein, Felder & Steiner, 96 NY2d 300, 305; see Bishop v Maurer, 9 NY3d 910, 911). [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 6:38 am
Hanna is an Orange County attorney. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, the Appellate Division observed Supreme Court should not have awarded Firefighter attorneys' fees as there was "no basis for the award absent an agreement, statute, or court rule providing for [such] relief". [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, the Appellate Division observed Supreme Court should not have awarded Firefighter attorneys' fees as there was "no basis for the award absent an agreement, statute, or court rule providing for [such] relief". [read post]
1 May 2011, 5:44 am
The case is Kindred v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:01 am
In Brown v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Attorney General Jeff Sessions in U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Starting with the general rules in Texas, a creditor must sue for payment of debt "not later than four years after the day the cause of action accrues. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 5:42 pm
In Texas Department of Transportation v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:51 am
In the recent case of Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 5:15 pm
The majority of the Supreme Court of Canada has construed the equitable power of the court to rectify a contract or other document relatively narrowly in a recent decision, Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 11:13 am
Chamber attorney Andrew Pincus, partner at Mayer Brown, countered that the Supreme Court in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
Pincus of Mayer Brown in Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 11:01 am
Young v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:52 am
The rule requires attorneys to provide all clients with a written letter of engagement explaining the scope of legal services, the fees to be charged, billing practices to be followed, and the right to arbitrate a dispute under Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 137 (see 22 NYCRR 1215.1 [b]; see generally Grossman v West 26th Corp., 9 Misc 3d 414 [2005]). [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:32 am
The rule requires attorneys to provide all clients with a written letter of engagement explaining the scope of legal services, the fees to be charged, billing practices to be followed, and the right to arbitrate a dispute under Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (22 NYCRR) part 137 (see 22 NYCRR 1215.1 [b]; see generally Grossman v West 26th Corp., 9 Misc 3d 414 [2005]). [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 6:12 am
During a recent brown bag lunch he offered some general wisdom about lawyering in DC and with the FDA in particular. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:00 am
See Weil and Brown Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2015) 8:1178.1 citing Coy v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:00 am
See Weil and Brown Civil Procedure Before Trial (TRG 2015) 8:1178.1 citing Coy v. [read post]
