Search for: "B Ware"
Results 241 - 260
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 6:46 pm
The abundance of tweets at the AALS Annual Meeting (#AALS2015) made me sit up and take notice of how many more law professors there seem to be on Twitter now compared to 2012 when I last updated the Census of Law Professor Twitter users (see Version 1.0 here and Version 2.0 here). [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
Regal Ware, Inc et al (Docket Report) ITC decides not to review initial determination on invalidity in certain printing and imaging devices involving Ricoh and Oki Data (ITC Law Blog) ITC decides not to review enforcement initial determination in certain voltage regulators (337-TA-564) involving Linear Technology and Advanced Analogic Technologies (ITC Law Blog) Defending yourself in inequitable conduct proceedings – CAFC en banc hearing pending: Therasense, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:43 pm
B Bacon County Includes the cities of Alma, Rockingham, and Sessoms. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 4:38 pm
Allen on the HHS News & Views Facebook group webpage between March 2018–December 2019; b) A letter written by Mr. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:46 am
(b) Except as otherwise provided by this section, a pesticide dealer must obtain a license for each location in the state that is used for distribution. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a… [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The SCC (by a 7-2 majority) dismissed Google’s appeal and upheld the injunction.According to taste and point of view the decision is:(a) a victory for a small Canadian company against a US tech giant(b) a damaging precedent for future overreaching assertions of extraterritorial jurisdiction by other nation states(c) a narrowly decided case about interim injunctions with few broad implications(d) a case that paid insufficient attention to its underlying territorial moorings(e) a… [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
See Ware v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:15 am
The court distinguished several other cases on the ground that they only involved a right to reproduce and sell records, even though some of them had cited a 1937 Pennsylvania case, Waring v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 1:10 pm
Such creditors may have the right to make an election under Section 1111(b) of the Bankruptcy Code to waive their unsecured rights and have their entire claim treated as secured regardless of the value of the collateral, but (another “but”), that is beyond the scope (way beyond) of this brief note. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
In an era of giant corporate structures, utilizing the national media to sell their wares, the original concern for an emerging manufacturing industry has given way to the view that it is now the consumer who must be protected. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
But earlier law society publications, not needing any such “urgency scenarios” with which to sell their wares with straight-faced exaggeration or excessive minimization, don’t mention such “self-represented litigant” figures at all. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 6:26 am
De Hoge Raad geeft eerst weer wat de overeenkomsten inhouden: “3.2 (…) Uit het vonnis van de kantonrechter volgt dat de vraag in het bijzonder betrekking heeft op overeenkomsten (a) die gesloten zijn tussen enerzijds een in het kader van zijn beroep of bedrijf handelende (rechts)persoon (hierna: de aanbieder) en anderzijds een natuurlijk persoon die handelt voor doeleinden die buiten zijn beroeps- of bedrijfsactiviteiten vallen (hierna: de consument), (b) en waarbij een… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:59 am
(Fitchburg, MA; Angel Aldrich, President) Aa&B Home Improvement Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 2:03 pm
” The district court (Judge James Ware, Northern District of California) granted the US’s motion to intervene and granted the US’s motion to dismiss. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
My previous post on this topic raised the issue of how the law firm of Goodwin Procter obtained ECUSA's "informed consent" to hire it to prosecute multiple lawsuits against realigning parishes and dioceses in its name, given that attorneys from Goodwin Procter at the time also represented ECUSA's Presiding Bishop. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Data privacy and data protection The ICO formally reprimanded the Home Office in line with article 58(2)(b) of the UK GDPR for leaving ‘official sensitive’ documents in a public venue in London. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
In 1937, in Waring v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
We start with the General Government, considering the division of its power into three “bundles”—(a) Executive; (b) Legislative; (c) Judicial. [read post]
