Search for: "B. Sullivan"
Results 241 - 260
of 1,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2019, 8:41 am
Here’s what the noncompete in that case said: For one year after my employment with O’Sullivan ends, either voluntarily or for cause, I agree that I will not (a) sell, attempt to sell, or assist others in selling or providing products or services in competition with the Business of O’Sullivan at the Restricted Contacts; or (b) help, financially or otherwise, any person or entity to compete with the Business of O’Sullivan by using or… [read post]
2 May 2009, 12:34 pm
Michael B. [read post]
12 May 2011, 8:07 am
B. [read post]
2 Mar 2007, 7:30 am
From the New York Law Journal: Former Sullivan & Cromwell associate Aaron B. [read post]
20 Dec 2006, 1:05 am
Dec 19, 2006) (NO. 9875, 1655/76)Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elizabeth B. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 6:44 am
Clarkin, David B. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 6:42 pm
” Exhibit B is a letter to Ms. [read post]
6 May 2007, 6:32 pm
(a) Jane Sullivan Roberts, partner, Pillsbury Winthrop (b) Philip Perry, partner, Latham & Watkins (c) Fred Fielding, White House Counsel (d) John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States (e) All of the Above The answer: (e)! [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:44 am
Kaster of Nichols Kaster in Minneapolis and Jeffrey B. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:02 pm
” When Passananti told him that there was no violation, he started screaming at her and told her to “shut the ‘F’ up, you lying ‘B’. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
LexisNexis has selected some of the top “noteworthy” panel decisions issued by the California Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board during the period January through June 2023. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 3:13 pm
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: Biglaw, Callback interviews, Callbacks, Fall Recruiting, Interview Stories, James Leipold, Jim Leipold, Job Searches, John B. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:28 am
Doug Mataconis at Outside the Beltway points out a case in which a recently-defeated Congressman (Ohio Democrat Steve Driehaus) is suing a political advocacy group (in this case a pro-life group called the Susan B. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
& B. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:45 am
§§ 78j(b), 78ff, SEC Rules 10b-5 and 10b5-2, 17 C.F.R. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:12 am
The Sullivan & Cromwell firm, which argued the case on behalf of Porsche, has a detailed January 3, 2011 memorandum about the case here. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:46 am
B thought it was pretty good. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:34 am
Judge Anita B. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 1:54 pm
The plaintiffs, who were represented by Matthew B. [read post]
