Search for: "BARR v. STATE" Results 241 - 260 of 1,062
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am by Kate Evans
Some state statutes sweep broadly, like the Georgia law at issue in Moncrieffe v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 9:00 am by Kalvis Golde
., the justices will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Schmidt’s Donald Trump v. the United States report that Mueller was prevented from exploring that avenue by then Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.] [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 6:13 pm by Anna Salvatore, Benjamin Wittes
Flynn filed a motion to compel certain material under Brady v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 7:26 am by Eric Goldman
A federal district court preliminarily enjoined Executive Order 13943 seeking to kick WeChat out of the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am by INFORRM
Balancing competing rights Irish defamation cases are increasingly replete with comments stating the need to balance the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the constitutional right to a good name. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 7:50 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
EPIC’s Freedom of Information Act case—the first in the nation for the disclosure of the Mueller Report—is EPIC v. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:30 am by Tia Sewell, Anna Salvatore
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s Sept. 2 decision on United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 11:20 am
  The median age in the United States is around 38. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm by Eric Goldman
Barr, a 2020 case out of the DC Circuit—both significantly limited the scope of liability for web scraping under federal law. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 8:41 am by Nathaniel Sobel
But two new sources of information—the fifth volume of the Senate Select Intelligence Committee’s bipartisan report on Russian interference in the 2016 election and New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt’s new book “Donald Trump v. the United States”—raise even more questions about the investigation. [read post]