Search for: "BES v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 68,496
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2008, 10:32 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
Using force to kill is indeed the ultimate exercise of physical control over another human being. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:24 am
Accordingly, disciplinary proceedings which could lead to a teacher being statutorily barred from working with children were determinant of an individual’s right to practice his profession and art 6 was engaged by those proceedings. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:20 am
In the case of Kansas v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam); [2011] WLR (D) 283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 1:42 pm
Read More > The post California v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:23 am
Last Friday for the first time I used the new United States Supreme Court decision in Padilla v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:17 am
Regina (SA (A Child) (by SH as litigation friend)) v Kent County Council (Secretary of State for Education, intervener) [2011] EWCA Civ 1303; [2011] WLR (D) 326 “The obligations imposed on a local authority in certain circumstances pursuant to section 23(2) and (6) of the Children Act 1989, relating to the provision of accommodation and/or maintenance for certain children in need and being looked after by the authority, were to be considered as alternatives, rather… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm
Presley v. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
Importantly, after reading the various takes on United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:05 pm
It also avoided the asked-for reconsideration of Missouri v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 1:30 am
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 9:43 am
Colvin, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, June 29, 2016 More Blog Entries: Stacy v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 6:45 am
“Evidence indicates,” the report states, that merger and acquisition litigation is “now being pursued almost exclusively in state courts after the unusual jump in federal M&A filings in 2010 and 2011. [read post]
4 May 2024, 12:35 pm
Valeo.The post NY State v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:59 am
In the case of Ball State University v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:51 am
State v. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 9:21 am
That Supreme Court case, Clapper v. [read post]
