Search for: "BOUNDS V. STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 10,065
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
Further, where the letter of intent is unambiguous and constitutes an enforceable contract, it is unnecessary to have a plenary hearing on the merits of a motion to enforce a settlement agreementFacts: The appeal arose out of the execution of a letter of intent which was the result of the settlement of litigation over the contested ownership of parking spaces.Analysis: Distinguishing Cochran v Norkunas, which held that the parties did not intend to be bound by… [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 12:01 pm
By Dennis Crouch Gunn v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:45 am
In Gale v Serious Organised Crime Agency, the UK Supreme Court sent a simple message to Strasbourg: if we are duty bound to follow decisions of the ECtHR then, at least in this area, they need to be clearer. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 pm
Alvarez stated that the principles of collateral estoppel ensure that the absent putative class members? [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 12:52 pm
Mendez v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:15 pm
What is scandalous is the dismissal of this behavior in the recently filed amicus brief filed at the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit by the United States Department of Justice (USDOJ) in the matter of Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
United States (1992) and Printz v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:18 pm
In Homa v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:57 am
The Circuit Court decided that "the state-law claims should be dismissed so that state courts can, if so called upon, decide for themselves whatever questions of state law this case may present" and "we do not think that those courts should be bound, or think themselves bound, by principles of collateral estoppel or otherwise, to any findings or conclusions reached by the district court in its discussion of whether, as a matter of law,… [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:46 am
The executive order creating the board expressly stated that it "shall not be a board of the city, but a board of mayor. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:32 am
The Court stated that it was not bound to follow the decision of the ECtHR in James v UK and the express wording of art 5(1) or 5(4) did not create any relevant duty to provide prisoners with a reasonable opportunity to progress their rehabilitation and release. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:20 pm
Nonparties to a contract are generally not bound by an arbitration agreement. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
In Hester v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 7:32 am
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously in favor of Bank of America in Caulkett v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:18 pm
Are wrongful death beneficiaries bound by an arbitration agreement when bringing a wrongful death claim? [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 1:17 pm
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 1:47 pm
Although state guidelines vary on these requirements, this is generally true across the board in all 50 states. [read post]
28 May 2014, 8:00 am
Mar. 14, 2014) presents a single issue, stated as follows by the Ninth Circuit: In Urbino v. [read post]
