Search for: "BROWN v. SUPERIOR COURT" Results 241 - 260 of 914
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Humphrey; Tribal Political Dissident) Brown, et al. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
Georgia Courts continue to recognize this evidentiary burden as seen most recently in Custer v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 4:57 am by Contributor
On July 20, the Superior Court of Justice released its newsworthy decision in Morris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 9:36 pm by Ilya Somin
(Rafael Henrique | Dreamstime.com)On Monday, the Supreme Court held oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:36 pm by David Oliver
The dissent gets at the heart of the matter writing: "Nothing in this record explains why [the expert's] opinion Brown contracted an enterovirus from his "exposure to sewage water" is superior based on science. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 7:14 am by Patricia Salkin
The court therefore held that the superior court erred in reversing the Board’s decisions in all four appeals Forsyth County Georgia v Mommies Properties, LLC, 2021 WL 926616 (GA App. 3/11/2021) [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 10:54 pm by David Ettinger
Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 617) because he failed to seek immediate review of the ruling by filing a petition for writ of mandate? [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 11:06 pm by Mike
Rump filed suit in Contra Costa Superior Court on May 11, 2009 alleging that he was not properly compensated while employed by Phillips. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 8:30 am
"In September 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent 1000 members of the 101st Airborne Division into Little Rock to desegregate Central Highschool in the wake of the Brown v Board of Ed decision. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:56 pm
Superior Court, 52 Cal.App.4th 97 (1997), the California Court of Appeal for the Second District held that a law enforcement agency must generally provide the names of officers involved in a critical incident. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 11:02 am by Kent Scheidegger
  It divided 5-2 on the interpretation of the five-year limit and on the provision that allows superior court decisions in habeas corpus cases to be appealed to the intermediate courts of appeal rather than the state supreme court.The case is Briggs v. [read post]