Search for: "Baker v. Stevens" Results 241 - 260 of 293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 7:00 am by Katie Bart
For example, according to The Washington Post, “[s]ome of those in line for Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:20 pm
In its decision this week in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
New York, in which they would infamously hold that a state law setting maximum hours for bakers was unconstitutional. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Stevens, No. 05-2497 Conviction for selling depictions of animal cruelty is vacated, and the statute itself, 18 U.S.C. section 48, is declared unconstitutional, where: 1) the criminalization of depictions of animal cruelty, rather than of the acts of cruelty themselves, is a content-based regulation on speech; 2) the speech in question does not constitute a new category of unprotected speech; and 3) the government has not shown that the statute is narrowly tailored, using the least… [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Drone’s influential 1879 treatise endorsed Drury as the way to go, so when the SCt reversed in Baker v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
The civil suits are largely on hold—thanks to a legally-debatable decision by Judge Beaty to delay discovery while Durham’s attorneys (who have, to date, billed the city for nearly $5 million, according to the AP) appeal to the 4th Circuit. [read post]