Search for: "Barrett v. Hand"
Results 241 - 260
of 514
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2022, 4:48 pm
After nearly 90 minutes of debate in Arizona v. [read post]
23 Feb 2022, 1:29 pm
The Pueblo (and also the Alabama-Coushatta), by contrast, argue that the reference to “prohibited” activities is a short-hand reference to the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in California v. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm
Roberts, the author of the notorious 2013 ruling in Shelby County v. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
As Barrett explained, Congress authorized suits in the Natural Gas A [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
Barrett has said a number of astonishing things in her brief tenure, but here is my favorite line, from oral argument in Carson v. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:58 pm
Fifty-eight years later, in Brown v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
In Stenberg v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
Times v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 12:17 pm
And Justice Stephen Breyer on occasion just holds his head in both hands. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 4:30 am
To take a leading case, in Whren v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:45 pm
From the Petition for Certiorari in the case, Kennedy v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 9:37 pm
By my count, Babcock was the first regular case the Court has handed down this term. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:41 pm
The health care vaccine case In Biden v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:51 pm
The Supreme Court’s stumble through the City of Chicago v Fulton opinion is no exception to this rule. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 1:58 pm
Asbill On July 9th, 2020, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in McGirt v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
" Pulliam v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:29 am
In United States v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
The main event is another case, Dobbs v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:01 pm
He plans to hand the cashier a threatening note but not to use any force. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:05 pm
Casey, indicating that he was searching for a way to uphold Mississippi's ban by discarding the idea of viability while maintaining precedent and avoiding having to formally reverse Roe.Kavanaugh and Barrett, on the other hand, seemed uninterested in doing so. [read post]
