Search for: "Basis International Ltd."
Results 241 - 260
of 1,806
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2021, 9:59 pm
The US District Court for the Southern District of Florida ruled on Sunday that Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings, Ltd. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 1:00 pm
The notice requirement, itself, had been confirmed in Frits Loendersloot v George Ballantine & Sons Ltd [1977] ECR I-227. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:06 am
The basis of the rejection was that the defendants did not infringe the trademark rights of the plaintiff. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
KLN Steel Products Company, LTD. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 12:29 pm
Mintel Int’l Group, Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:34 pm
[…]Alcon Research Ltd. at *2 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm
In the Courts Australia Bailey v WIN Television NSW Pty Ltd [2020] NSWCA 352- a defamation case concerning an article run on the termination of the employment of the General Manager of a county council. [read post]
21 Nov 2020, 4:11 pm
Corus Entertainment Inc 2020 BCSC 1533 Milman J granted a motion for the summary dismissal of a number of libel actions on the basis of defences of justification and fair comment. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 11:22 pm
Digi International Inc. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
The second was that, although the public might distinguish MIL’s products from those of Aldi, they would nevertheless assume a connection between the two, such as a common manufacturer (as in United Biscuits (UK) Ltd v Asda Stores Ltd [1997] RPC 513 where this was successfully pleaded). [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
However, Group Chimiche Tunisien countered this, stating that the July contract contained no clause for London arbitration and therefore the dispute could be resolved in the courts of Tunisia.Midgulf submitted that the parties had contracted in July on the basis of Midgulf's offer, which stated that jurisdiction and arbitration were to be in accordance with the June contract which provided for English law and London arbitration, which was accepted orally. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 12:48 am
., Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The software was specifically adapted to enable purchasers to stream and download infringing copies of programs made available by Bell, Bell Expressvu, Rogers, and Videotron on a subscription basis. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 3:24 am
In March this year the Admiralty Court in London handed down its judgment in respect of a collision between “Alexandra 1” (“A1”) and “Ever Smart” (“ES”) (see: Nautical Challenge Ltd v Evergreen Marine (UK) Ltd [2017] EWHC 453 (Admlty)). [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 7:34 am
On 5 October 2018, the English Court of Appeal confirmed the High Court decision in National Challenge Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 10:31 am
Ltd. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 4:23 pm
It may not be Alice v CLS Bank International all over again, but Lantana Ltd v The Comptroller General of Patents, Design and Trade Marks [2014] EWCA Civ 1463, a Court of Appeal for England and Wales from 13 November, shows that when it comes to disqualifying computer software from patentability [or patent eligibility, as the Americans prefer to call it] on the basis that it doesn't disclose an invention, the Brits can do the job at least as elegantly as… [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 8:54 am
(Joa) sought to have the patent revoked on basis that the Patent lacked both novelty and inventive step over prior art. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:46 am
On December 23, 2009, the International Trade Commission issued a notice determining not to review ALJ Charles E. [read post]
