Search for: "Baxter v. Baxter"
Results 241 - 260
of 673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2016, 11:23 am
Select Comfort Corporation v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:31 pm
Justice Kennard and Moreno say "Sometimes," and Justice Baxter (in dissent) says "No. [read post]
21 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
That brings us to the relatively recent case of Fisher v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:23 pm
Ultimately, Justice Baxter writes an unpersuasive (at least in my mind) opinion that concludes that a remand is necessary because the multiple witnesses who testified that the decedent intended to divorce his wife and that the decedent "felt that his marriage was a mistake because his wife had continued to work as a prostitute despite her promises to stop" were insufficient as a matter of law to prove that divorce was likely. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 11:05 pm
Baxter v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 12:00 pm
Superior Court, S166350, the Court granted the California Employment Law Council’s (CELC) application to file an amicus brief to address a question regarding prospective-only application of the imminent decision—a question not previously briefed by the parties, but raised by Justice Marvin Baxter at oral argument. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 5:45 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Sarkar v West London Mental Health NHS Trust [2010] EWCA Civ 289 (19 March 2010) Maroudas v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2010] EWCA Civ 280 (18 March 2010) Connor v Surrey County Council [2010] EWCA Civ 286 (18 March 2010) William Hare Ltd v Shepherd Construction Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 283 (18 March 2010) Bloomsbury International Ltd & Ors. v The Sea Fish Industry Authority & Anor… [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:00 pm
" Gentry v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 8:58 am
In a case in which there is some doubt about the claimant’s title to the patent itself, the suggestion is that title has to be perfected by the judgment of the court – for example, ensuring that the legal owner must be joined to the proceedings (see Baxter v NPB [1998] RPC 250). [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:36 pm
The search of Baxter's property and the seizure of the nine horses did not violate the Indiana Constitution. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:01 pm
Baxter Int’l, Inc., 721 F.3d 1330, 1334 (Fed. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
It was also fairly lame, in my opinion, that Justice Corrigan (joined by Justices Baxter and Chin) begins the dissent with the following paragraph: "The ordinance at issue is a practical and responsible attempt by the City of Stockton (Stockton) to address problems it, and many other cities face on a daily basis. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 3:53 pm
Authored by Jim Harris The California Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Duran v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 9:01 am
Supreme Court ruling last June of Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:14 am
" In Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 5:13 pm
See "District Court Analysis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Votes: George, C.J., Kennard, Baxter, Werdegar, Chin, Moreno, and Corrigan, JJ. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 4:14 am
" Baxter Int'l, Inc. v. [read post]
