Search for: "Beard v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 552
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
United States, involving the prosecution of threats made on Facebook. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:36 am
State v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 4:20 pm
Holt is an example of this trend: 50 years ago there were likely no observant Muslim inmates in the State of Arkansas, so the question of Muslim inmates’ beards simply did not arise. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 7:00 am
Citing the Court’s recent decision in Beard v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:45 pm
LEXIS 83814 (CD CA, Sept. 15, 2009), a California federal magistrate judge held that a Sikh prisoner who was denied an exemption from beard length restrictions had not stated a claim under the First Amendment, but had stated a claim under RLUIPA. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 5:20 am
LEXIS 53236 (D AZ, May 6, 2010), an Arizona federal district court concluded that an inmate failed to state a free exercise claim in his complaint that food items were missing from his trays.In Cosco v. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:25 am
In Seymore v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 7:05 pm
In December, without any independent evidence that the men had engaged in hostilities against the United States, U.S. officials sent them to Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:34 am
It could be argued, as in the Onassis v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 11:44 am
(A “United States work” is a work first published in the United States, or simultaneously published in the United States and any foreign country; or an unpublished work (or a work first published in a nation with whom the United States does not have a copyright treaty) for which all authors are citizens of or domiciled in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 7:27 am
Hobbs, holding that Arkansas prison officials cannot prohibit a Muslim inmate from growing a half-inch beard, drew commentary from Dawinder Sidhu, who at Religion and Politics suggests that “[a] plausible claim can also be made that Holt foreshadows the end of affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Locomotive Engineers argument 12/8/2009 Beard v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Beard? [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
Arnold v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Even more so as I sit here today, working from home, wearing a Captain American t-shirt and a quarantine beard. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 1:28 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am
Beard, 633 F.3d 126 (3d Cir. 2011) (granting relief on Brady claim), with Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:02 pm
In a decision that perhaps requires a chalkboard and a couple readings to fully grasp, the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has held that §203(o) of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA") does not preempt state law that lacks an equivalent exception.In Spoerle v. [read post]
