Search for: "Bitter v. Bitter" Results 241 - 260 of 998
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2018, 10:20 am by Eric Goldman
Generally, everyone benefits when litigants settles their cases rather than fighting to the bitter end. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
The first is Apple v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Camuso‘s holding is reminiscent of Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272 [2018]. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps weighs in on Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Ingrid Wuerth cautions that, when the court decides Jam v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
  But there is also, crucially, the development of a notion of a Constitution that becomes “fixed” and therefore made unchangeable (save for the near-futile path of constitutional amendment set out by Article V). [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 1:00 pm by Sheldon Gilbert
” Although few now remember Matthews’s bitter confirmation battle, he is perhaps best remembered today for his 1886 opinion in the case of Yick Wo v. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:31 pm by Lyle Denniston
Another precedent that some of his critics said might be vulnerable is United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
They have fought long, bitter and costly legal battles, but as Margaret Simons says in her biography of Stokes: In the cosy club of media, neither love nor hate lasts forever. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm by John Dean
Also, it is not clear to me if Judge Kavanaugh does or does not believe U.S. v Nixon (the 8-0 holding that ended Nixon’s presidency, forcing him to provide prosecutors incriminating secretly recorded conversations) was correctly decided.My second general point is a very important process matter. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 3:38 am by Lyle Denniston
., issued a separate opinion Wednesday suggesting that the Supreme Court, in its decision last term in the Wisconsin case, Gill v. [read post]