Search for: "Black and White Corporations I-V" Results 241 - 260 of 355
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Domain Name Law White hat domainers are not black hat cybersquatters. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:12 pm by @ErikJHeels
Domain Name Law White hat domainers are not black hat cybersquatters. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
  It's All There in Black and White: The illustration at the outset of this post of course depicts the characters from the classic Spy v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:53 am
For example, an employee may claim that the black workers were twice as likely to be laid off as white workers. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 6:53 am by admin
  Urban renewal projects have long been associated with the displacement of blacks; “[i]n cities across the country, urban renewal came to be known as ‘Negro removal. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
”  (Relying on Drake v. 3M, 134 F.3d 878 (7th Cir. 1998) (white employee may sue under Title VII based on discrimination resulting from his friendship with black co-workers). [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 7:59 am by Amanda Leiter
 The Act spells out the number “one hundred tons” in black and white. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 1:13 pm by Frauke Renz
Mercenaries are defined in Art. 47 of the Additional Protocol I (AP I) to the Geneva Conventions. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
Of course this includes both what it says and what it does, and what it says may assist in interpreting the true effect of acts which might otherwise be equivocal, but is not open to the landlord to turn black into white merely by assertion. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Notwithstanding tobacco’s high death toll and damaging health effects, tobacco companies have survived hundreds of lawsuits challenging their promotion and distribution of a deadly drug, including Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]