Search for: "Black v. Cook" Results 241 - 260 of 296
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2022, 3:52 am by SHG
Two V’s don’t work right now: voting and vaccines. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 9:03 pm by Joshua Burd
The final stay was in response to a lawsuit brought by Cook County, Illinois. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Administrator
It was as if Faskens had simply said you have to go because you are a Catholic or a Jew or black or a woman. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Jeanine Cook wanted students to use clips from Selma, other film, and was unable to do so because of current limitations. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am by Kyle Hulehan
Including the $3.00 per pack tax in Cook County and $1.18 per pack in the city of Chicago brings the total taxes in Chicago to $7.16 per pack. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
(IPKat) EU favours disclosure of computer patents before standards are set (Intellectual Property Watch) Trade Marks Court of First Instance finds RAUTARUUKKI fails to satisfy acquired distinctiveness criterion: Rautaruukki Oyj v OHIM (Class 46) Court of First Instance finds original signature of famous Italian lutist Antonio Stradivari, in arte Stradivarius, of the 17th century, cannot be read by relevant consumers: T‑340/06 (Catch Us If You Can!!!) [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 12:07 am
How can I not think of my personal ability to choose and thus my personal choices as being the product of the fortune of being born in America, and the fortune of being born in a post-Loving v. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 8:28 am by Russell Knight
Cook County Court Rule 13.3.1(a) You have to be honest when filling out a financial affidavit in an Illinois divorce! [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 6:34 am
The fun and games concerning the General Court's failure in Cases T-253 and 354/09 Wilo v OHIM is/are now over. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 5:20 am
Here is somelanguage from the decision, North Carolina v. [read post]