Search for: "Black v. Court of Appeals et al" Results 241 - 260 of 356
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
In 2015, for instance, she spoke at a rally opposing California's new strict school vaccination bill, and was later quoted in the Sacramento Bee (David Siders et al.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am by Ben
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 3:26 pm by David Cheifetz
Instead, this 40% magnitude of reduction results only in a loss of chance which is not compensable in medical malpractice cases (See: Cottrelle et al v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Kokesh appealed the decision, and the Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit affirmed. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:34 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The case is Blagojevich, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:52 am by Howard Knopf
    Case: 33921Entertainment Software Association, et al. v. [read post]
24 May 2020, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 19 May 2020, Soole J heard an appeal from Deputy Master Sullivan in the case of France v Khan. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
Without the Supreme Court taking up the case, a federal appeals court ruling from October, which found that the book-scanning program fell under the umbrella of fair use, stood. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am by Public Employment Law Press
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am by Michael Sweig, JD
Giuliani, Mayor of the City of New York, et al, 290 F.3d 143 (2nd Cir. 2002), now US Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor, then a circuit court appeals judge, dissented from the majority decision that the New York City Police Department didn’t violate a policeman’s First Amendment rights when it fired him for mailing (from home and anonymously) bigoted screeds against Jews and Blacks. [read post]