Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 929
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2016, 8:08 am
I agree, though it should be mentioned that some of this could also be addressed much sooner by Congress or via state legislatures. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 3:30 am
Last term, in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:29 am
In Blakely v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 12:00 pm
Blake, United States District JudgeHolding: Tort claims based on conduct prior to the execution of a contract are not outside the scope of the agreed to forum selection clauses and that enforcing said clauses, which refer to “any legal action” related to the agreement.Facts: In 2013, Defendant, Old Dominion Electric Cooperative (“Old Dominion”) entered into an Equipment Purchase Agreement (“Alstom Agreement”) with Defendant Alstrom… [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 7:09 am
Illya Bond (Power Source ) U.S. and Plaintiff States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 12:10 pm
Yet at oral argument in Dobbs v. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 10:10 am
., et al & United States of America v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 2:52 pm
In 1941, the US Supreme Court recognized in Cox v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 7:35 am
Judicial reactions, formal and informal, to Gall and Kimbrough The weighty guidelines question after Gall One (of many) tough questions after Gall and Kimbrough Is Kimbrough as big as Brown v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:52 pm
State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
This issue before the court was one of first impression in the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
But a new Seventh Circuit decision from just last week, United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
Exhausting administrative remediesRoss v Blake, USSC, Docket No. 15-339This decision by the United States Supreme Court considered an appeal involving the federal Prison Litigation Reform Act [PLRA], 42 USC 1997e(a) requirement that an inmate exhaust “such administrative remedies as are available” before bringing suit. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:15 am
The Court's per curiam ruling in Burton v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:58 am
"
State v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 1:26 pm
See United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:00 am
Opinions in Argued Cases THE STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
Watson argues that the United States should formally repudiate the discovery doctrine set forth in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
" The Oregon Supreme Court reversed and remanded for resentencing, holding that the sentencing court–by imposing consecutive sentences based on its own findings and not based on jury findings–violated respondent’s rights under the Sixth Amendment, as construed in Apprendi and Blakely. [read post]
