Search for: "Blowers v. Blowers" Results 241 - 260 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm by Cindy Cohn and Karen Gullo
Gladwell’s piece examines what he sees as the differences between whistle-blowers Edward Snowden and Daniel Ellsberg, and concludes that Snowden doesn’t deserve the respect (or apparently the same legal protection) that Ellsberg does. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:25 am by MTTLR Blog Editor
Employee privacy protectionsCourts have split over the protections given to text messaging, attempting to weigh the need to access communications in the ubiquitous and casually-used medium against privacy concerns.In Quon v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 11:55 am by Tom W. Bell
Courts have already explained that wrongs under the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act require a showing that someone's reasonable expectation of privacy has suffered violation (see Fearnow v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 11:28 am by Jim Walker
We advised the “whistle-blower” crew members to notify the CDC. [read post]
30 May 2010, 12:10 pm by Tom W. Bell
Courts have already explained that wrongs under the Maryland Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance Act require a showing that someone’s reasonable expectation of privacy has suffered violation (see Fearnow v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 10:18 am by Daniel Schwartz
But its a strange thing to happen nonetheless because it was only through a judicial decision, Cotto v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 5:35 am
(Spicy IP) Coversyl (Perindopril) – Canada: Court of Appeal upholds Trial Division finding of patent validity and infringement: Apotex v ADIR (Pharmacapsules@Gowlings) Cozaar (Losartan) – France: French Patent Office grants paediatric extension of French SPC for Losartan (The SPC Blog) Cozaar/Hyzaar (Losartan) – US: FDA prevails in generic Cozaar/Hyzaar 180-day exclusivity forfeiture litigation: Teva Pharmaceuticals v Sebelius (FDA Law Blog) Diflucan… [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Whistle Blowers: Professor Peter Menell was instrumental in proposing a public policy immunity provision that is included in the DTSA. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The Judge found that the broadcast bore the following defamatory meanings of the claimant companies: there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the claimants were responsible for the abuse and exploitation of workers, and the persecution of a whistle-blower, at ATA, one of their supplier companies located in Malaysia, and that they tried to cover up the allegations and shut down public criticism. [read post]