Search for: "Blowers v. Blowers"
Results 241 - 260
of 344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Nov 2010, 7:20 am
On Lawyering: a report and video links on the implications of the new "collateral consequences" case, Padilla v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 8:18 am
Air Leakage Testing—Blower door testing is required in all residential buildings and structures. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:34 pm
Cloutier v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
” Wrighten v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:58 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 8:58 am
(Campbell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:04 pm
The Court of Appeals upheld the summary judgment in this opinion, Chadd v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 11:18 am
Under the most recent law protecting whistleblowers, the Dodd-Frank Act (the new Financial Reform bill), employers cannot “‘discharge, demote, suspend, threaten, harass, directly or indirectly, or in any other manner discriminate against, a whistle-blower in the terms and conditions of employment because of any lawful act done by the whistle-blower’” (for more information on the new U.S. law see “New Financial Reform Law Provides Incentives for… [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 4:48 am
"Further, the Appellate Division held that that predetermination interest is generally available to whistle blowers suing pursuant to Civil Service Law §75-b.* See Tipaldo v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
The short story of Segaline v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 10:12 pm
Look at the recent suffocation of Carver v BAA Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412 in the L G Blower Ltd v Reeves [2010] EWCA Civ 726 decision. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:58 am
Kindley, at his blawg, People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:31 pm
–-Fuller v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
Goldberg, M.D. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 9:36 am
Goldberg, M.D. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 4:45 am
After a very long gestation, the Minnesota Supreme Court has finally issued its decision in Kidwell v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 12:55 am
One example given of this is the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in L G Blower Ltd v Reeves (reported within Gibbon v Manchester City Council [2010] EWCA Civ 726) which recognises that although the case of Carver v v BAA Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 412, concerning beating Part 36 offers by a narrow margin, is binding on them, for all practical purposes it can generally be ignored. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:36 am
In L G Blower Ltd v Reeves, R had made various offers at various times in varying amounts At one point all previous offers save for a 'May 2007? [read post]
