Search for: "Board v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 241 - 252
of 252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (Afro-IP)Australia Professor Fitzgerald’s opinion article ‘It’s vital to sort out ownership of ideas’: (IP:KCE)BrazilBrazil wrestles with decision on GM corn, seed patenting: (Intellectual Property Watch),PTO recognized as international patent search authority: (International Law Office)CanadaTrade mark statistics - CIPO 2006-2007 Annual Report: (Canadian Trademark Blog)IP injunctions in Canada: (ipblog.ca),Professor Ariel Katz’… [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:42 am
(PDF 1.2 MB) Report Prepared Under the Auspices of the National Intelligence Council03/19/2008
Lawsuit Filed in the Matter of Fred Hollander v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 1:40 pm
CIR Commissioner of Internal Revenue 08a0101p.06 AmeriCredit Fin Serv v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution … [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:11 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286) is now available here. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (06-1286). [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
The case, known as Stoneridge Investment Partners v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 7:23 am
Littriello responded by initiating complaints for judicial review in districtcourt, contending that the regulations in question (1) exceed the authority of the Treasury to issue regulatory interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code; (2) conflict with the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Morrissey v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 1:57 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue U.S. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 9:58 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, T.C. [read post]
24 Aug 2006, 2:09 pm
The court then cited Commissioner v. [read post]
