Search for: "Brady v. State of California"
Results 241 - 260
of 302
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
• Florence v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 10:19 am
The United States Supreme Court held that a single violation of Brady obligations is not sufficient to create civil damages liabilities for a district attorney’s office under section 1983. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Siers: Reasoning that, under State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:28 am
" California Appellate Districts, January 17, 2008 "Amtower v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
First, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
The case accepted by the justices comes from California, where a law passed in 2000 prohibits employers from using money they receive from the state to oppose or support unionization efforts. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
State of California, 72 Cal. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 11:43 am
California; and (2) whether the Navajo Nation can state a cognizable claim for breach of trust consistent with the Supreme Court’s holding in United States v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Petitioners’ reply United States Steel Corp. v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
Ctr. for Women v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 1:01 pm
USGS Open-File Report: 2014-1189 Pesticide trends in major rivers of the United States, 1992-2010 2014, Ryberg, Karen R.; Vecchia, Aldo V.; Gilliom, Robert J.; Martin, Jeffrey D. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
In an essay for Notice and Comment, Professor Zachary Price of the University of California, Hastings College of the Law cautioned that a Trump Administration loss in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 17, 2009 US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 7:13 am
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, which has opposed V.'s opposition to gun control. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
