Search for: "Briggs v. Briggs"
Results 241 - 260
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2018, 7:57 am
Lord Hodge (on behalf of Lady Hale, Lord Hughes and Lord Lloyd-Jones) delivered the majority view, with only Lord Briggs dissenting. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 7:23 pm
For example, becoming familiar with the geography of Clarendon County, SC, may help students better understand the 1952 court case Harry Briggs Jr. et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:41 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, Supreme Court to hear “serious harm” appeal On Tuesday and Wednesday 13 and 14 November 2018, the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge and Briggs) will hear the appeal in Lachaux v Independent Print Limited & Anor UKSC 2017/0175, against the Court of Appeal decision of Davis LJ, with whom MacFarlane and Sharp LJJ concurred ([2017] EWCA Civ 1334). [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Clarke LJ held, applying the principles in Cory v Burr (1883) 8 App Cas 393 and Wayne Tank and Pump Company Ltd v Employers Liability Assurance Corporation Ltd [1974] 1 QB 57, where there are two proximate causes, one that is covered and the other subject to an exclusion, liability will not arise. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:39 am
Lord Briggs alone, whilst agreeing with the decision, did so on slightly different grounds, which he felt were aligned “more closely with the conceptual analysis adopted in other common law jurisdictions”. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:41 am
" (Briggs v. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
Briggs, 2009 U.S. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 7:43 am
” Ultimately, however, Lord Briggs acknowledged that while there might be room to extend the lien to other legal service providers, th [read post]
Case Comment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
28 Jun 2018, 7:15 am
Judgment in the case of R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 is here. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 8:38 am
It is important to note the decision in euNetworks Fiber UK Limited v Abovenet Communications UK Limited, where Briggs J had held that notwithstanding the decisions in Suisse Atlantique and Securicor, "if the effect of an exclusion clause is to deprive the agreement of the legal characteristics of a contract, by conferring on one party to the liberty to ignore his obligations with impunity, the exclusion may be held to be repugnant to the contract and of no effect". [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 12:52 pm
v=U312vxv4-ro Because of the Engle decision, victimized smokers from the 1930’s, 1940’s and beyond had the opportunity to bring Big Tobacco to task. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:24 am
Silberman, Morrison v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:06 am
Briggs & Co. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 7:59 am
You can access it here.This morning the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, handed down its keenly-awaited decision in Fage UK Ltd & Another v Chobani UK Ltd & Another [2014] EWCA Civ 5, on appeal from the decision of Mr Justice Briggs last April at [2013] EWHC 630 (Ch). [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 8:05 am
Briggs, 475 U.S. 335 (1986), should be reconsidered or clarified? [read post]
17 May 2012, 5:54 am
Briggs, 349 N.J. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:29 am
Dupont De Nemours & Co., 219 F.3d 13, 21 (1st Cir.2000); Briggs v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 12:43 am
On 25 February 2021, the UK Supreme Court heard the appeal in Anwar v The Advocate General (Representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:11 am
Lord Briggs and Lady Rose recognise that this conclusion may lead to results which at first look counterintuitive and unfair. [read post]
