Search for: "Buckman v. Buckman" Results 241 - 260 of 375
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2012, 7:32 am by Bexis
  The FDA, not litigants, is entrusted with the responsibility to police the sufficiency of the evidence to support a PMA approval.Duggan, 2012 WL 45503, at *5 (citing our old pal, Buckman Co. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 6:32 am
  Even there, how a law review discussion of “whether preemption would apply to common law claims when the manufacturers deceived the FDA,” id. at 204, can occur without citing Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  About the only good thing about Blockis its refusal to allow Parisian to testify directly that the defendant violated the FDCA, that being both an improper legal opinion and barred by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 1:50 pm by Bexis
  That would be a preempted fraud on the FDA claim under Buckman Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 8:56 am
The two Texas verdicts and the New Jersey punitive damages verdict in McDarby all contradict the Supreme Court's decision in Buckman v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 4:30 am
The court poured out the case because the claims were subsumed by the New Jersey Product Liability Act (PLA), no physical injury was plausibly alleged, and any claim that the defendant defrauded the FDA would be preempted by Buckman.  Closing time, right? [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
  That’s what the Bone Screw litigation was all about, and what the underlying fraud on the FDA allegations in Buckman Co. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:02 am
  Because that involves an FDA-imposed duty, it is easy to conclude that it looks a lot like a disguised form of FDCA enforcement barred by Buckman Co. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 11:58 am by Bexis
  That was settled by the Supreme Court in Buckman Co. v. [read post]