Search for: "Bush v. U.s.*"
Results 241 - 260
of 486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 7:16 am
§ 1512) that was at issue in yesterday's oral argument in Fischer v. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 11:43 am
Bush. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:46 pm
Faced with a similar issue in TVA v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 6:56 pm
See Shelly v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:29 pm
The Supreme Court decision in Stewart v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:10 pm
I had fully expected this DoJ to sneak in through the back door the timely appointment requirement invented by the Ninth Circuit in Spears v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 7:07 am
Bush (06-1195) and Al Odah v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
Bush (2004): "The Court is correct, in my view, to conclude that federal courts have jurisdiction to consider challenges to the legality of the detention of foreign nationals held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in Cuba. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
Lucy, an African American graduate student, enrolled at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, pursuant to a court order in the case of Lucy v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 7:09 am
In Holder v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 8:48 am
Bush. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
It neither mentioned the historical examples of Presidents Carter, Bush, Clinton, or Obama, nor cited the Sale case.Then there is the Fifth Circuit, Knoetze v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 3:06 pm
Here is how Judge John Bush's opinion for the court in Wright v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The order, issued in Khadr v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 9:08 pm
The efforts of the Bush Administration to use the Military Commissions Act to bar the courts from considering the Geneva Convention is an affront to our commitment to international law. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
Bush. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
” The inherently compromising loyalty of family relationships is one reason why Congress passed 5 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 7:38 pm
Sepulvado v. [read post]
11 Mar 2017, 6:47 pm
” In Washington v. [read post]