Search for: "Butts v State"
Results 241 - 260
of 654
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2018, 10:43 am
The state of Ohio allows the penalty for those older than eighteen.A recent court decision in Commonwealth of Kentucky v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:23 am
Butts (1967). [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 1:44 pm
In Jenkins v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
Or should constitutional law butt out, because norms are actually unstable in this area? [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:00 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit: Oliver v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:53 am
The defendant's affidavit also stated that, if the judge did not allow his motion, then at the "very first chance," the defendant "will physically assault, spit, kick, head-butt, etc. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 12:17 pm
Last month, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Knick v. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 4:27 am
And parents are able to opt their kids out if they reject the idea of allowing the school to spank their kid on the butt. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:56 am
Coyote, Plaintiff v. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 12:36 pm
Evelyn Thomas Butts to have the state’s poll tax declared unconstitutional. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 3:56 am
Cases that involve dealings between sovereign states is one good example; the claim in Buttes, a 1980s fight between oil companies which depending on which state had the power to grant a particular oil concession, offended against this rule. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 4:47 am
The Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the State of California v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 10:05 am
Butt Grocery Co., 440 S.W.2d 885, 889–90 (Tex. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 7:53 am
The post Liebeck v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 11:07 am
The Maryland Court of Appeals recently held in Tracey v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:27 am
I appreciate that the Central London CC had suggested (and applied – see Butt) the contrary view, but that wasn’t going to survive in the CA. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
Pennsylvanians who get taxed on such necessities can now cite Bach v. [read post]
