Search for: "C. v. A." Results 241 - 260 of 61,949
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2020, 11:09 am by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Statute of Limitations for contract claims v. claims for wages was compared and contrasted in Weik, Nitsche & Dougherty, LLC v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
Failing to continue GML §207-c benefits during the pendency of a challenge to a medical determination that the individual is able to return to workMatter of Westchester County Correction Officers Benevolent Assn., Inc. v County of Westchester, 2010 NY Slip Op 02572, Decided on March 23, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentThe Westchester County correction officers [COs] sustaining an injury in the line of duty and unable to perform their duties as a result of such an… [read post]
14 Nov 2009, 9:02 am by Bartolus
It thus goes further in this case than in Case C-129/00 Commission v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:12 pm by Bartolus
But that is just what it did in its judgment in Case C-89/08 P Commission v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 9:54 am by Dr. Shezad Malik
The allegedly defected hernia mesh devices include the Atrium C-Qur mesh, C-Qur TacShield and C-Qur V-Patch. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 6:32 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández (Capital University Law School) has posted Padilla v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 3:36 am by sally
Borger v Tiroler Gebietskrankenkasse (Case C-516/09); [2011] WLR (D) 89 “The status of an ‘employed person’, within the meaning of article 1(a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71, as amended , applied to a person during a six-month period of extended unpaid leave following the birth of a child, provided that, during that period, that person was covered, even if only in respect of a single risk, on a compulsory or optional basis, by a general or special social… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm by Bartolus
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-118/07 Commission v Finland on the need to amend existing bilateral agreements with non member countries concluded by a member State before it acceded to the EU. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:26 am by immigrationprof
§ 1101(a)(13)(C)(v), which divests a legal permanent resident of his right, under Rosenberg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:12 am by sally
Ziebell v Land Baden-Württemberg (Case C-371/08); [2011] WLR (D) 358 “Protection against expulsion conferred by article 14(1) of EEC-Turkey Association Council Decision No 1/80 did not have the same scope as that conferred on citizens of the Union pursuant to article 28(3)(a) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/38/EC with the result that the scheme of protection against expulsion enjoyed by the latter could not be applied mutatis mutandis to Turkish nationals for… [read post]
21 May 2010, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
  The first request granted was in Bush v. [read post]