Search for: "C. v. C."
Results 241 - 260
of 61,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2011, 10:43 am
(Orin Kerr) I was on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal this morning discussing the Supreme Court’s pending Fourth Amendment case Kentucky v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:23 am
In ex parte appeal to TTAB, applicant argues that Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act violates the First Amendment under Matal v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 3:52 am
Discontinuing General Municipal Law Section 207-c benefitsDacey v Dutchess County, 121 AD2d 536 An individual is receiving benefits pursuant to Section 207-a or Section 207-c of the General Municipal Law and is absent on disability leave. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:32 am
Zachary C. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 9:03 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in a follow-on case in Case C-427/06 Birgit Bartsch v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:08 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down a neat judgment in Case C-209/07 Competition Authority v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 1:54 am
eDate Advertising GmbH v X: Martinez and another v MGN Ltd; (Joined Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10); [2011] WLR (D) 330 “Under article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 a person who considered that his privacy rights had been infringed by content placed online on an internet website had the option of bringing an action either before the courts of the member state in which the publisher of that content was… [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:57 am
Regina v S(C): [2012] EWCA Crim 389; [2012] WLR (D) 54 “Where the purpose of a legislative scheme was to ensure that a child could be subject to the protection of the court, there would be no defence of necessity available in respect of the offence of removing a child from the jurisdiction of England and Wales.” WLR Daily, 29th February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 10:20 am
The post Stephen C. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 2:25 am
Les vérifications des antécédents ne peut pas vérifier avec précision vos antécédents. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:32 am
First, there are the linked cases R (on the application of GC) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and R (on the application of C) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, being heard from Monday 31 January to Tuesday [...] [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:03 am
In Hecker v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:25 am
In Atkinson v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (TNT Post UK Ltd) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners (Royal Mail Group Ltd, interested party) Case C-357/07 Court of Justice of the European Communities “The Royal Mail was exempt from value-added tax as a supplier of public postal services, except for supplies of goods or services whose terms had been individually negotiated. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am
Social clubs must be supported by membership fees, dues, and assessments.[26] Most museums’ governance make-up and membership structure could be seen as a characteristic of a 501(c)(7) social club rather than a 501(c)(3) charitable nonprofit.[27] In American Campaign Academy v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 2:44 pm
WALLACE C. [read post]
7 May 2017, 3:00 am
One issue was a Supreme Court case from 1921 called Dillon v. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:24 pm
Most of the judgment in Joined Cases C-231/06 to C-233/06 Office national des pensions v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 1:31 pm
Real property — Foreclosure sale — Motion to stay Paula C. [read post]
