Search for: "C.B."
Results 241 - 260
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2009, 9:58 pm
Rul. 93-73, 1993-2 C.B. 75) , which in turn agreed to drop its multi-front litigation “war” against the IRS. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:45 am
Rul. 93-73, 1993-2 C.B. 75)... [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 6:49 am
Proc. 2004-29, 2004-1 C.B. 918. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 9:12 am
C.B. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 1:06 am
C.B. [read post]
20 May 2009, 11:33 am
Though my father had a huge contraption in his big Lincoln that looked like a C.B. radio. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 1:02 am
Rul. 83-163, 1983-2 C.B. 26, the IRS concluded that members of a barter club must report gross income when they receive services through a barter exchange. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:00 am
In Clark C.B. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 10:14 am
Proc. 2003-61, 2003-2 C.B. 296. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 11:34 am
I. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 1:18 am
C.B. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:09 pm
In two similar cases in which the victims were found frozen to death, Levin & Perconti received a $950,000 settlement for C.B. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:31 pm
In response to the FDA's alert, one manufacturer, C.B. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 12:32 am
Proc. 2003-85, 2003-2 C.B. 1184), to $105,000 for 2005 (Rev. [read post]
30 Dec 2008, 9:00 pm
Proc. 99-17, secs. 5.03(1), 5.04, 1999-1 C.B. at 504, 505. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
C.B. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:30 am
Rul. 73-201, 1973-1 C.B. 140, the Court noted that the IRS had ruled that the cost of a vasectomy is an eligible non-cosmetic medical expense because it affects the structure of the taxpayer's body, whereas the in vitro fertilization procedures in which the taxpayer had participated did not affect his bodily functions and structures because "they remained the same before and after those processes. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 11:04 pm
All of this was followed closely by a drug company announcement about some similar over-the-counter (OTC) products; from their press release, "C.B. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:16 am
Rul. 82-208, 1982-2 C.B. 58, the IRS concluded that no deduction would be permitted in year 1 for estimated tax payments for year 1 that were unreasonably too high for year 1. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 2:36 pm
As a result of this warning, Los Angeles Times reports that C.B. [read post]
