Search for: "CHAPPELL v. CHAPPELL" Results 241 - 260 of 305
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
A tale of Dudes and Smoothies  Katfriend Richard Kempner discusses Fresh Trading Limited v Deepend Fresh Recovery Limited and Andrew Thomas Robert Chappell [2015] EWHC 52 (Ch), a Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision addressing the copyright ownership in the ‘Dude’, ie the logo used on Innocent’s smoothie bottle in the past 15 years. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:29 pm by Thomas James
Statute of Limitations and Damages Warner Chappell Music, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 2:35 am
It was discovered in the V&A Archives (where the majority of Potter’s papers reside) in 2015 by an amazingly fortunate editor at publisher Penguin Random House Children’s. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:44 pm by Florian Mueller
Michael Chappell handed down an order (PDF) granting parallel motions by which Microsoft and Activision Blizzard--with the FTC's consent--sought to withdraw six of their 23 defenses to the agency's merger complaint. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 5:43 am by Ben
The case is Nirvana LLC v Marc Jacobs International LLC et al. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 6:45 am by Kenan Farrell
Webber Chappelle (ND, filed 6/4/2021) – On September 13, 2021, the Court provided notice that the action may be dismissed for failure to serve process. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 7:55 am by Brett Trout
As Lord Somervell noted in Chappell v Nestlé, half a century ago “A peppercorn does not cease to be good consideration if it is established that the promisee does not like pepper and will throw away the corn. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 7:33 am by Brian Cordery
Tina Chappell noted that patent systems were an invention to speed up the developments of other inventions. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am by Eugene Volokh
Supp. 2d 619, 626-27 (D.N.J. 2007) (citing Schenck). [9] Chappell v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
And hard as it is to believe, Chappell v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm by John Elwood
Chappell, 14-6264, a pro se petition in a capital case out of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:47 am by Rory Little
About two-thirds into the opening argument in Jennings v. [read post]