Search for: "COCHRAN v STATE"
Results 241 - 260
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Kaye also examines legal milestones, such as People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Cochran v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 7:35 pm
In Cochran v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:18 am
The case resembles Parks v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:55 pm
Wilson v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:10 am
Today the CCA handed down published opinions in the following cases:PD-1205-08, State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:09 am
Well, except for the fact that Illinois v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:08 am
Well, um, in Miles v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am
The State charged Pamela Langham with possession of cocaine and a jury found her guilty. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 7:39 pm
Quarterman and Brewer v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:58 pm
The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals released its opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 7:57 am
Such questions about jury instructions are an area of legal dispute that has bounced from state courts to the United States Supreme Court and back over the past 20 years. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:10 am
State,PD-0457-07, April Harlow v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am
However, I do think it's kind of ironic that Judge Cochran starts off with quotes from the dissenting opinion from Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:07 am
Judge Meyers first noted that the State must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that a defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
From Judge Cochran's majority opinion:This is all very awkward. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 10:05 am
State and Evans v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 2:35 pm
Cochran, 377 F.3d 522, 525 (6th Cir. 2004) (same); Barnhart v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 7:06 am
The court held that there is no liability for open and obvious dangers and also stated that the plaintiff had a duty to look where she was walking and see that which was obvious.ASSUMPTION OF RISK DOCTRINEThe continuing validity of the assumption of risk doctrine under Pennsylvania jurisprudence remained uncertain in 2009.The Commonwealth Court utilized the doctrine in two separate cases, Cochrane v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 6:20 am
While the Commonwealth Court repeatedly upheld the doctrine to dismiss suits by plaintiffs in the cases of Cochrane v. [read post]
