Search for: "CONDIT et al. v. CONDIT et al."
Results 241 - 260
of 3,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2018, 7:25 am
Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. et al, 2-11-cv-02389 (CACD April 5, 2018, Order) (Otero, USDJ) [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:05 am
Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al, 2-09-cv-00290 (PAWD March 31, 2014, Order) (Fischer, J.) [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:36 pm
With its March 28, 2012 decision in Federal Aviation Administration, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 1:39 pm
Specifically, the petitioners argue that the DOI's approvals of the plans violated both the OCSLA and the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) because: (1) the DOI failed to consider the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster in approving further deepwater drilling; and (2) the DOI conducted an inadequate review of the plans under NEPA, because it incorrectly applied "categorical exclusions" (from the NEPA requirements of preparing environmental assessments or… [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
A “Class of One” is not available to an individual in litigation involving a public employer Appel v Spiridon et al, 531 F.3d 138* A faculty member employed by Western Connecticut State University [WCSU] was told that she would be required to submit to a medical examination involuntarily as a condition of her being continued in her employment with the University. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 1:39 pm
Elizabeth Medical Center Inc., et al. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:00 am
Sprint Nextel Corp. et al. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 10:43 pm
Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al. 2020 WL 7423109 (2020), the U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 9:55 am
By Kevin Smith and Brian Murphy On July 9, 2013, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its opinion in Torres et al. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 6:25 am
LaPolla Indus., Inc., et al., No. 6:13-cv-646-Orl-36KRS (Dkt. 48). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:46 am
Morrice et al., Civ. [read post]
28 Oct 2017, 10:03 am
Honeywell International, Inc. et al. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
Donald Van Gelderen et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:46 am
Secure Horizons, et al. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:47 am
SAIF Corp., et al., (WCB 0407794) (CA A138825) (SC S058081)"... [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 1:06 pm
Vomero v City of New York, et al has unanimously held that the City of New York Board of Standards and Appeals abused its discretion in granting a use variance to use residentially-zoned property for commercial use. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 6:35 am
The case is entitled Copley et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:36 pm
Mission Peak Conservancy, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 1:50 pm
Atlantic Video, ESPN et. al. [read post]
