Search for: "CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. US "
Results 241 - 260
of 7,768
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2023, 11:42 am
For instance, if the confidential informant was used as the basis of a grand jury indictment, then a motion to dismiss may be considered. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 6:42 am
See Craig v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 12:13 pm
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 7:48 am
This case, LBI, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
Garrigan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:27 am
Regards, Roy] Employees’ Informational Privacy Rights — Supreme Court Decides NASA v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 3:16 pm
We have R v Stewart in the Supreme Court of Canada in 1988, holding that information as such could not be stolen because there was no property in it. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 8:47 pm
Argus Leader, arguing that the Eighth Circuit misinterpreted the meaning of “confidential” information under Exemption 4. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
Instead of purchasing the seller’s business, the prospective buyer used the seller’s confidential information to create its own competing product. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
Besser v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:37 pm
” The underlying case, Food Marketing Institute v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 3:28 am
Ohio) in Beverage Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
The court disagreed with this narrow interpretation, citing the Sixth Circuit opinion in Lee v City of Columbus for the proposition that Section 12112(d)’s use of the phrase “confidential” is meant to be interpreted in the light of preventing employers from discriminating on the basis of information gleaned from job-related medical examinations. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 6:11 am
Kleiman v. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:36 pm
In a unanimous decision debunking the common misunderstanding that former employees can use information they retain through memory (as opposed to information contained in materials pilfered from former employers) without violating trade secret law, the Ohio Supreme Court ruled that a company’s confidential customer list is a protected trade secret even if a former employee accesses it strictly from memory.In Al Minor & Assoc., Inc. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 12:22 pm
Nor did he or she have incentive to lie to obtain drugs, because the informant did not use drugs. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 1:06 pm
However, Fielding affirmatively promised not to use or disclose Mann Frankfort's confidential information. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
In the case of R (Ingenious Media) v HMRC ([2016] UKSC 54) UK Supreme Court held that information provided by taxpayers to HMRC is confidential and that HMRC acted unlawfully by disclosing such information to journalists. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 7:07 am
The information contained in the Registry is kept confidential by the Ministry and police. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
Moreover, the protective order did not restrict "the disclosure or use of any information or documents lawfully obtained by the receiving party through means or sources outside of this litigation. [read post]
