Search for: "COOK v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT"
Results 241 - 260
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2014, 8:59 am
Cowles v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:25 am
Rico Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
”[v] This is fundamentally unfair to the collection of tax revenues by the RTA and Cook County because American and United Airlines primarily operate in Cook County. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
See Blair v. [read post]
9 Mar 2014, 4:00 pm
In addition to employees meeting the definition of “employer,” the DOL states that a valid tip pool may not include employees who do not customarily and regularly receive tips such as dishwashers, cooks, chefs, and janitors. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am
‘Exposing a Grave Injustice’: Montreal Exclusivity and the Rights of Disabled Passengers On March 5, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Stott v Thomas Cook (previewed for the UK Supreme Court blog last autumn here). [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm
This is a common industry practice. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 2:57 am
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd, heard 20 November 2013. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 4:49 pm
Not accidental which depictions get deemed raw v. cooked, though not entirely determinative. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 10:02 pm
When Michael Taylor declared Escherichia coli O157:H7 an adulterant in ground beef, there were howls of, “Just cook it,” from the industry and from within FSIS. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:44 am
The case pitted the American Public Health Association v. [read post]
12 Jan 2014, 6:14 am
(Daubert v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:28 am
Cook, and the Eastern District Court of Appeals came to a similar conclusion in the case of Amesquita et al. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
IP Tango reports that unregistered marks are getting a bit of respect in the Argentine courts, at appellate level at any rate, in a battle for SAN GENARO pasta. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Borello & Sons, Inc v Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal.3d 341. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Then, state and federal courts were reluctant to apply tort law even where automobile-accident victims claimed their injuries resulted from the failure of manufacturers to exercise reasonable care in the design of their motor vehicles. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 9:26 am
Schultz v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:04 am
And, of course, not surprisingly, the court in this case was quick to cite the decision in APHA v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
The district court cited Tricontinental Industries, Ltd. v. [read post]
