Search for: "California Company v. Price" Results 241 - 260 of 1,495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
Citing Thompson v. 1800-Contacts, the court finds antitrust standing among consumers who possibly paid higher prices due to the restrictions on keyword ads: Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants agreed to manipulate paid search results so that when a cons [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:16 am by Steve Harms
See Power Press Sales Co v MSI Battle Creek Stamping, 238 Mich App 173, 183, 604 NW2d 772 (1999). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:01 am by John Jascob
California, home to FS Development, also is the headquarter location of new registrants Dragoneer Growth Opportunities and Gores Holdings V. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am by Florian Mueller
Later, the Court of Justice of the EU brought a bit more balance into that analysis with its Huawei v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 8:37 pm by Josh Wright
  (Bloomberg) Private suits follow as the FTC consent decree in Pool Corp “has spawned a batch of lawsuits in California, Louisiana and Florida over allegations that the company’s tactics drove up prices, stifled competition and limited consumers’ choices. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am by Eric Goldman
Adler calls himself the TEXAS HAMMER, and he objected to the defendant’s use of the term “hammer” in the defendant’s ad copy statements like “we hammer insurance companies. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:09 am by Daniel Shaviro
 In a class that is coming up soon, we will be discussing the U.S. transfer pricing rules.From a purely pedagogical perspective, when I read the recent case of Altera Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 2:47 am by Lisa Stam
 This is the question in Phonedog v Noah Kavitz, a California case that will no doubt have an impact in Canada. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 12:56 pm
When someone dares to challenge Yelp or its postings, many of our Northern California neighbors get exercised. [read post]