Search for: "California Company v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 9,721
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jan 2011, 2:20 pm
The final judgment in People of the State of California v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 8:57 am
Los Angeles, CA - Copyright attorneys for dietary supplement company Iwin Labs filed a copyright infringement lawsuit, in the Central District Of California (Los Angeles Division), accusing rival nutritional company of copying its website design. [read post]
9 May 2018, 3:09 pm by Christopher Wilkinson
On April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 6:22 am by Nassiri Law
In response, some companies like VOX Media have laid off workers en masse – or blacklisting California writers to hire those in other states. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
On April 28, 2022, the California Court of Appeal issued a much-anticipated decision in Wong v. [read post]
17 May 2022, 6:30 am
On April 28, 2022, the California Court of Appeal issued a much-anticipated decision in Wong v. [read post]
The California Secretary of State has appealed a decision by the Los Angeles County Superior Court striking down the second of California’s two board diversity laws, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in California to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:06 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Accordingly, in a typical case where a California company is alleged to have misclassified out-of-state employees, this case almost certainly will preclude suing on behalf of those out-of-state employees under the UCL, so long as payments were not made in California. [read post]
28 May 2021, 2:20 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
Moriana, a former employee of a cruise company sued the company under California’s Private Attorneys General Act, which allows workers to recover civil damages on behalf of themselves, other employees and the state. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 8:58 pm by Peter Vodola
In January, the California Court of Appeals issued its opinion in Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables, No. [read post]
Uber’s ongoing battle with Waymo in the Northern District of California federal court over technology used in self-driving cars provided another significant decision concerning the broad scope of trade secret preemption under California state law. [read post]