Search for: "California v. Arizona" Results 241 - 260 of 2,106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2022, 6:51 pm by Samuel Bray
Aaron Nielson has a fascinating post at the Notice and Comment blog on Arizona v. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Top marginal rates range from North Dakota’s 2.9 percent to California’s 13.3 percent. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
But the Court’s religiosity also emerges in nominally non-religion controversies, including Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm by Bill Marler
Five deaths were reported from Arkansas, California, Minnesota (2), and New York.[1] In addition to this outbreak being unusually large, case-patient clinical course was unusually severe. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 1:29 am by Peter Mahler
” As in the Arizona case, the court rejected the plaintiff’s argument that judicial di [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 5:00 am by John Wester and Emma Kutteh
The design of the class action covered consumers in Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina, New Mexico, Maine, Minnesota, Michigan, South Dakota, Utah, California, Iowa, North Dakota, and West Virginia. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
” Challengers argue that the law is impermissibly extraterritorial because virtually all the pork consumed in California is raised outside the state. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
California Beginning January 1, 2022, California’s cannabis cultivation taxes increased to reflect an adjustment for inflation as required under the Cannabis Tax Law. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
I asked her if Utah and Arizona were the first dominoes that would set off a chain reaction of other states following suit. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am by Bob Ambrogi
I asked her if Utah and Arizona were the first dominoes that would set off a chain reaction of other states following suit. [read post]
Fifth Circuit Decision Although the 5th Circuit enjoined the OSHA vaccine mandate, which applied to all businesses with more than 100 employees, in BST Holdings, LLC v. [read post]