Search for: "California v. Brady"
Results 241 - 260
of 329
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2011, 9:15 am
The Court held in Schriro v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:59 pm
Espinoza v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:40 pm
Supreme Court Sides with Vaccine Manufacturers in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 12:56 pm
Brady and held that the Sixth Amendment’s g [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm
Arizona promptly sent some of them over to California to alleviate a shortage there. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm
Isom v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am
Storch’s prior informant history, in violation of his due process rights, and that the Court withheld material evidence in violation of Brady. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 7:48 am
Brady of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 8:55 pm
App. 11/17/2010) (unpublished) Remand as State concedes Brady error. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 3:29 am
The first was Wednesday’s oral argument in the Supreme Court in Connick v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm
§ 1681t, preempts a California statute that creates a private damages remedy for violations of state law with respect to the obligations of furnishers of information to CRAs.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for the American Bankers Association et al.Amicus brief for the California Apartment AssociationAmicus brief for the Consumer Data Industry Association Title: Wilson… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:00 pm
Question Presented: "Whether failure-to-train liability may be imposed on a district attorney’s office for a prosecutor’s deliberate violation of Brady v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:59 am
Brady,492 N.E.2d 34, 39 (Ind. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 5:51 am
Brady of Connolly Bove Lodge & Hutz LLP. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 5:09 am
A California appellate court, in Barnett v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Premo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
Roger Hoan Brady, 2010 Cal. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:58 am
And the California Supreme Court will unanimously affirm.The only thing surprising about this one -- though, perhaps, we should not be surprised, since I see this time and time again -- is the docket sheet. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:17 am
Despite the perception that the decision was a setback for gun control advocates, Paul Helmke, President of the Brady Center and Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, said in a statement that he was “pleased that the Court reaffirmed its language in District of Columbia v. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
Storey v. [read post]
