Search for: "California v. Lord"
Results 241 - 260
of 304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm
A federal judge in California has found a privacy settlement between a class of email users and Google inadequate, asking the parties to come up with a more detailed disclosure of how Google intercepts and uses emails for targeted advertising. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
They have ruled that a clause in Facebook’s terms of use requiring all suits to be heard in California courts is invalid. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:20 am
There are cases where Singapore do vary including the application of the law of passing off as applied in the House of Lords case of Scandecor. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
California Ramirez v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am
On November 8, Sotomayor presided over a Supreme Court Historical Society re-enactment of Clay v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:04 am
On Friday, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), after four years of litigation, shifted its strategy in its banner NSA case, Jewel v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 9:25 am
He attended the best schools on the island and also in California and England. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm
The Lord Chief Justice expressed concern at the withdrawal of legal aid for private law family disputes during his annual press conference. [read post]
25 May 2011, 6:11 am
Marques v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 2:28 pm
In fact, in complete contradiction to what I touted at the outset, Forest Park Pictures v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 7:38 am
So, for this case anyhow, the CYAC v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:00 pm
– Facebook’s contractual rights to users’ photos problematic: (Spicy IP)PharmaEuropean Commission probes pharmaceutical sector: (Philip Brooks),WHO Board sets course on IP, avian flu, tighter publication policy: (Intellectual Property Watch),India: The Competition Act, patents and over hyped drugs: (Part I - Spicy IP), (Part II – Spicy IP), (Part III – Spicy IP),Ignoring not the solution –… [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:26 am
District Court for the Southern District of California. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
” [Abrams v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
California “gig” workers may be. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am
Walker v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
21 May 2024, 5:55 am
For instance in Tremblay et al. v. [read post]
