Search for: "California v. Marks"
Results 241 - 260
of 4,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2020, 10:21 am
Adler v. [read post]
25 Aug 2019, 2:28 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 12:00 pm
AT&T v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:23 pm
” Id. at *2 (citing Rhines v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
In the now infamous case of Gomes v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
A. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 2:35 am
In a non-precedential ruling, the CAFC affirmed the TTAB's decision in University of Southern California v. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:16 am
The court referred to Perez v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 4:55 pm
The decision in New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 4:55 am
Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
For example, one such disadvantage is that unregistered trademarks are geographically restricted to the area where the mark is utilized. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
For example, one such disadvantage is that unregistered trademarks are geographically restricted to the area where the mark is utilized. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
By Mark A. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
As we wait for the California Supreme Court to decide Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:29 pm
And unanimously affirmed.That's your California biblical reference for the day. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 11:30 am
This was filed in May: Starbuds Cannabis Club Collective; Mark Gustely v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
Paleteria La Michoacana, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:14 am
Line One Laboratories Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 2:00 am
Mark I. [read post]
