Search for: "California v. May"
Results 241 - 260
of 26,082
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2013, 6:09 am
Harris v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:38 am
In Etheridge v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 7:36 am
In Willemsen v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:48 pm
In May of 2018, a California appellate court handed down an important decision clarifying employers’ liability for waiting time penalties. [read post]
13 May 2016, 1:00 pm
In Alvarado v. [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 11:15 am
In Peredia v. [read post]
18 Oct 2022, 9:00 am
May. 23, 2022) may turn out to be one of the most significant cases of the year for California employers. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:44 pm
Watersheds Project v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
In Crest v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 9:18 pm
This may not be the last PAGA decision – watch for developments from California courts or from the California Legislature. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 8:27 am
The Court of Appeal in Nguyen v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
In Sullivan v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 4:00 am
Newsom, (ED CA, May 5, 2020), a California federal district court refused to enter a temporary restraining order against enforcement of state and county COVID-19 stay-at-home orders. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 3:01 pm
(Brack v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:11 am
The California Court of Appeals opinion in Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables, No. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 12:27 pm
The California Supreme Court set forth criteria for DUI checkpoints to ensure they are in compliance with the Federal and California's State Constitution and to minimalize the intrusiveness of the stop in Ingersoll v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:50 pm
The California Supreme Court today denied the Application for Stay and Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the case of Bennett v. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 6:09 pm
Question: May a non-California consumer loan company enforce a non-California choice of law provision in its loan agreements to avoid application of the California Financial Lenders Law? [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 11:39 am
Here, the fairgrounds were rented by a private party for the festival, so the federal claim doesn't succeed.But as you may know, California has the Pruneyard doctrine, which is broader than federal law and allows access to private properties (e.g., shopping malls) under California's Free Speech Clause. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
On March 23, 2022, in Estrada v. [read post]