Search for: "Canada v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 6,314
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2013, 8:09 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here is the opinion in : AG Canada v Leonard & Gionet The court’s summary: L and M were Aboriginal Canadians whose extradition was sought by the United States of America to stand trial on drug charges. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
Because no such requirement exists in Canada, plaintiffs may enjoy a juridical advantage by pursuing their defamation claims in Canada rather than in the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:00 am
The ongoing case of Ktunaxa Nation v BC represents the first opportunity for the Supreme Court of Canada to consider whether the destruction of an Aboriginal sacred site constitutes a violation of freedom of religion under section 2(a) of the Charter. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 8:44 am by Stephen Pitel
This is particularly so after the United States largely relinquished this role last year in Morrison v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
    This is in the highly anticipated (well, at least for privacy lawyers) decision in the Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
The duty to consult is a constitutional obligation in Canada requiring governments to engage with Indigenous groups when decisions may affect their rights, lands, or resources, as established in the landmark Haida Nation v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:20 pm
On each occasion, the United States prosecutor revised the request per Canada’s specifications, only to have Canada identify other reasons to return it. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:42 am by Eugene R. Fidell
I am satisfied for reasons previously stated that the United States intelligence agency pressured the ISI to delay Khadr's repatriation to Canada for a period of six months. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 2:54 pm by nflatow
Third, to what extent are states required to afford recognition to legal statuses created outside the state by sister states? [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:34 am
UNCT/14/2 Eli Lilly & Co. v Government of Canada, (16 March 2017) ICSID At 10:00 on 17 Aug 2017 I shall give a talk to the IP Summer School at Cambridge entitled Bilateral Investment Treaties & Exporters' Rights Post-Brexit. [read post]
The Supreme Court of Canada has also previously found in the landmark decision of R v Golden that strip searches are ‘inherently humiliating and degrading’. [read post]