Search for: "Carney v Carney"
Results 241 - 260
of 657
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
The Court of Appeals reverses summary judgment in a Title VII retaliation case, finding that that the plaintiff engaged in protected activity and also undercut the defendant's reason for extending his employment contract with a trainload of pretext.The case is Zhou v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:19 am
The City of New York appeals the verdict, but the Court of Appeals affirms, and the plaintiffs get their money.The case is Marshall v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:05 am
The case is Sousa v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 7:13 am
The case is rejected under Rule 12.The case is Fahs Construction v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Lohier and Carney) says for the first time that civil contempt proceedings implicate First Amendment values. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 7:05 am
This case is about the attorneys' fees.The case is J.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 5:58 am
It certifies the issue to the State Court of Appeals for a definitive answer.The case is Schoenefeld v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:02 am
The Court of Appeals rejects the claim and finds the federal government had probable cause to arrest a man who was wrongfully accused of insider trading.The case is Ganek v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:15 am
The case is Aponte v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:16 am
This is such a case, the Court of Appeals (Raggi, Parker and Carney) holds. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
That is what happened here.The case is United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:24 am
The Court of Appeals has reversed summary judgment in a disability discrimination case, holding that the jury could find that the plaintiff was disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act and that her employer offered pretextual reasons for her termination.The case is Bar-Tur v. [read post]
19 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
But not every issue is an easy one, which is what the courts are for.The case is Moy v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:18 am
The inmate wins his appeal pro se against the big guns in Washington, D.C.The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:59 am
This case reacquaints us with that rule.The case is Velez v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:17 am
This pro se inmate has won his appeal in the Second Circuit, convincing the Court of Appeals that he has a real First Amendment retaliation claim against his jailers.The case is Kotler v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:12 am
The case is Geismann v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 7:22 am
The case is Domenech v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
The district court said no, but the Court of Appeals says maybe.The case is Paganas v. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 7:05 am
That's the rule in this case involving domestic violence committed by a former New York State Senator.The case is Giraldo v. [read post]
