Search for: "Carney v. Carney"
Results 241 - 260
of 623
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 6:15 am
The case is Aponte v. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
"The case is Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 7:05 am
This case is about the attorneys' fees.The case is J.S. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:59 am
This case reacquaints us with that rule.The case is Velez v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 7:12 am
The case is Geismann v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:18 am
The inmate wins his appeal pro se against the big guns in Washington, D.C.The case is Rodriguez v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:36 am
The district court said no, but the Court of Appeals says maybe.The case is Paganas v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:05 am
The case is Sousa v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
The Court of Appeals denies the appeal and the case heads for trial.The case is Savino v. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals (Lynch, Lohier and Carney) says for the first time that civil contempt proceedings implicate First Amendment values. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 8:24 am
The Court of Appeals has reversed summary judgment in a disability discrimination case, holding that the jury could find that the plaintiff was disabled under the Americans with Disabilities Act and that her employer offered pretextual reasons for her termination.The case is Bar-Tur v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 7:27 am
The Court of Appeals reverses summary judgment in a Title VII retaliation case, finding that that the plaintiff engaged in protected activity and also undercut the defendant's reason for extending his employment contract with a trainload of pretext.The case is Zhou v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:39 am
" These claims are hard to win, but they are winnable.The case is Stephenson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 7:17 am
This pro se inmate has won his appeal in the Second Circuit, convincing the Court of Appeals that he has a real First Amendment retaliation claim against his jailers.The case is Kotler v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 6:16 am
This case highlights the complexities of constitutional law, as the plaintiffs framed their case under the constitutional right to travel, not the First Amendment.The case is Jeffries v. [read post]
30 Oct 2024, 7:21 am
But the complaint has a problem, the Court of Appeals (Lynch, Park and Carney) says, and it dooms the case and entitles the defendants to qualified immunity. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 6:41 am
The First Amendment case also fails, the Court of Appeals (Carney, Bianco and Nardini) holds. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 9:33 am
Carney Jr., Jennifer Nassour, Chair, Mass GOP, and Jeff Jacoby, Syndicated Columnist. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:37 am
"Visioneer, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 6:25 am
” As the Supreme Judicial Court explained in Carney v. [read post]
