Search for: "Cave v United States" Results 241 - 260 of 287
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
Judge Norman Robison ruled that State Engineer Tracy Taylor “abused his discretion” and “acted arbitrarily, capriciously and oppressively” when he cleared the authority to pump more than 6 billion gallons of groundwater a year from Cave, Delamar and Dry Lake valleys. . [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court questions whether lawyers, of which the United States has no shortage, provide more social utility than scientists, engineers, and inventors. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 am
: Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v Theatre Mayo Clinic Company (Afro-IP)   Thailand Thailand to join PCT Treaty (The IP Factor)   United Kingdom UK IP minister hopeful of ‘significant progress’ on Community patent and court (IAM) EWHC: Woolworths woolly IP agreements don’t hold value: Butters & Ors v BBC Worldwide & Ors (IP finance) If you liked the Rule, you’ll love the Practice… [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
  A building or any part of a building that is in danger of falling down or caving in is not considered to be in a state of collapse;c. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 3:51 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 8:00 pm
(IPKat) Google – Google down to seven AdWord lawsuits – Ascentive v Google dismissed (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:55 pm
Phil Cave was kind enough to send me two opinions that CAAF issued today.The first is United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 pm
I used the Navy JAG's recent reversal of the United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:27 pm
I remain delighted by the writing in Judge Stucky's opinion for the court in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
1 May 2009, 4:33 pm
For reasons I hope to set out later in the weekend, I think changing the supp time periods in the immediate aftermath of United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 2:02 pm
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 12:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:28 am
“When I got to the United States Senate and went on the Judiciary Committee as a young lawyer,” he began, “I was of the view . . . that the only thing that mattered was whether or not a nominee . . . had a judicial temperament, had not committed a crime of moral turpitude, and was — had been a good student. [read post]